Monday, April 13, 2015

Cow/Calf Corner

COW/CALF CORNER

The Newsletter

 

From the Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service

April 13, 2015

 

North American cattle situation: Mexico

Derrell S. Peel, Oklahoma State University Extension Livestock Marketing Specialist

 

The Mexican cattle and beef industry is always dynamic and continues to evolve.  The industry has faced challenges in recent years with declining cattle inventories while attempting to maintain domestic production and cattle exports; all while beef exports have increased sharply.

 

The Mexican beef cattle industry experienced the same drought conditions that affected the U.S. in 2011-2013 leading to forced herd liquidation.  Moisture conditions improved significantly in 2014 and so far in 2015.  Herd expansion has been slow to begin in Mexico but may be beginning at the current time.  Cows and heifers have played a large role in maintaining domestic Mexican beef production and cattle exports in recent years and increased female slaughter contributed to herd liquidation.

 

Record U.S. cattle prices and a weakening Peso contributed to a 12.8 percent year over year increase in Mexican cattle exports to the U.S. in 2014 despite extremely tight cattle supplies in Mexico. Increased Mexican cattle exports in 2014 included more steers and spayed heifers compared to the previous year.  U.S. imports of Mexican cattle are up less than one percent for the first two months of 2015 compared to last year.  Year to date U.S. imports of Mexican steers are up 4.5 percent while heifer imports are down nearly 15 percent.

 

U.S. imports of Mexican beef are up 40 percent for the first two months of 2015 compared to the same period last year.  Reduced U.S. beef production and record high U.S. beef prices, abetted by the strong dollar, provide a strong incentive for more beef exports from Mexico to the U.S. which, in 2014, resulted in a 23 percent year over year increase.  Mexico has rapidly increased beef exports since 2009.  Total Mexican beef exports increased 17 percent in 2014 compared to one year earlier.  The 2014 export total is only slightly lower than the 2012 record despite the loss of the Russian market after 2012.  Increased Mexican beef exports are the result of rapid growth in feedlot production, increased carcass weights (partially offsetting lower cattle slaughter), and widespread adoption of boxed beef technology in recent years. The U.S. is the largest destination for Mexican beef exports, accounting for 84 percent of the 2014 total.  Mexico has been the fourth largest source of U.S. beef imports since 2010.  Other major Mexican beef export markets include Japan and, in 2014, Hong Kong.

 

Mexico has been one of the top four U.S. beef export destinations for 20 years.  Mexico imported 8 percent more U.S. beef in 2014 compared to the prior year despite record high U.S. beef prices and a poor exchange rate which makes U.S. beef even more expensive in Mexico.  However, U.S. beef exports to Mexico are down 13.5 percent year over year so far in 2015. 

 

Mexico, like the U.S. and Canada, is faced with the need for herd rebuilding which can only occur by squeezing current production to allow for increased heifer retention and reduced cow slaughter.  It will be difficult for Mexico to maintain the current level of domestic beef production, cattle exports and beef exports as herd expansion begins.  Continued strong U.S. prices for cattle and beef will continue to favor cattle and beef exports to the U.S. along with decreased imports of U.S. beef.  Current exchange rates add to these incentives.  However, limited cattle inventories and increased heifer retention in Mexico may moderate either cattle exports or beef exports or some combination of both.  Early trade flows in 2015 may indicate that domestic Mexican cattle demand may be strengthening enough to retain more feeder cattle in the country.  U.S. beef exports to Mexico will continue to face the disadvantage of high U.S. prices aggravated even more by a weak Mexican Peso.  However, to the extent that Mexico continues to grow beef exports, imported beef will be needed to maintain domestic beef supplies.  The increasingly bilateral nature of U.S.-Mexican beef trade emphasizes that beef trade is less about an imbalance in beef quantities in the two countries and more about the value enhancement from improved quality distribution and product mix in the two countries.

 

 

Oklahoma State University, in compliance with Title VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Executive Order 11246 as amended, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and other federal laws and regulations, does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, disability, or status as a veteran in any of its policies, practices or procedures. This includes but is not limited to admissions, employment, financial aid, and educational services.  References within this publication to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, service mark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply endorsement by Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service.

 

 

 

Tuesday, April 7, 2015

Yard & Garden



Yard and Garden
April 11, 2015


Q.   I have an old tree stump in the place I was thinking of putting a compost bin.  Will it hurt to just build compost over the stump and hope it rots or should I dig the stump out?


A.   The stump may cause some problems as you try to turn the compost, or it may form a back-stop to help you turn the compost.  The pile of decomposing material, properly moistened around the stump should speed the decomposition of the stump.  Another option is to cut the stump as close to the ground as possible so that it is less a hindrance as you turn the compost.  To speed the decomposition of the stump you can drill holes in the stump to allow even more contact with the decomposing materials of the compost and the microorganisms that will cause the decomposition of the stump.  Use one-half in to one inch spade bits on a drill to make the holes.
     However, since you said “old” stump I wonder what kind of tree produced the stump.  If the tree was a juniper or Arizona cypress tree the wood is very resistant to decomposition and may take longer to decompose than most other tree stumps.  In that case cutting it out of the way and drilling the holes may make even more sense.  If the tree was a cottonwood or willow, the wood will decompose quite rapidly once the composting environment develops.  Frequent additions of high nitrogen materials such as manure or kitchen scraps and water will help any stump decompose.  The end product of the decomposition of the stump will be good compost along with the compost formed from other materials.
     If it is important to get rid of the stump quickly, you can dig it out, cutting the roots and then pulling with a vehicle or with a pulley system.  Most trees do not have deep root systems that will make removal difficult.  I have heard of people burning the stumps as well.  If the stump is in a location where burning is not hazardous to structures and surrounding vegetation that is an option, but be very careful.  To make the burning more complete you
can drill the holes described above and fill the holes with kerosene or diesel fuel.  Do no use gasoline or lighter fuels.  Allow the fuel to soak into the wood, perhaps refilling the holes several times over several weeks.  Once the wood has absorbed the fuel ignite the stump.  Be sure the area around the old stump for a considerable distance is free of combustible materials and watch over it carefully.  Do this when there is no wind forecast for several days.  It may take quite a while for the stump to completely burn and wind could carry embers to areas where the fire is not wanted.  Personally I prefer the idea of turning the old stump into compost.  It is safer and the end product is more useful, but composting will take longer.



 




Send your gardening questions to Yard and Garden, Attn: Dr. Curtis Smith, NMSU Agricultural Science Center, 1036 Miller Rd. SW, Los Lunas, NM 87031. You may also send to cwsmith@nmsu.edu or leave a message at https://www.facebook.com/NMSUExtExpStnPubs.  Curtis W. Smith, Ph.D., is an Extension Horticulture Specialist, retired from New Mexico State University’s Cooperative Extension Service.  NMSU and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating.

Monday, April 6, 2015

Home Economics Newsletter

 Click on the link to view  Home Economics Newsletter!
 
Home Economics April/May/June 2015

Cow Calf Corner



COW/CALF CORNER
The Newsletter

From the Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service
April 6, 2015

North American cattle situation: Canada
Derrell S. Peel, Oklahoma State University Extension Livestock Marketing Specialist


The North American cattle and beef market is a complex set of cattle and beef flows among Canada, Mexico and the U.S.  These trade flows played a role in the unprecedented production and prices that occurred in 2014 and will play a role in 2015 and beyond.  Trade impacts among the NAFTA countries were generally as expected in 2014.  Beef imports from Canada increased while beef exports to Canada decreased compared to 2013.  Cattle imports from Canada and Mexico also increased year over year along with beef imports from Mexico.  Canada and Mexico accounted for a combined 31.1 percent of U.S. beef exports and 30.9 percent of U.S. beef imports in 2014. The impact of Canada and Mexico on the U.S. cattle and beef market may be different in 2015. More detail on the Canadian situation follows.

U.S. imports of Canadian beef increased 11.9 percent in 2014 compared to one year earlier. Canadian cattle slaughter and beef production increased year over year in 2014 as cattle inventories continued to decline.  However, cattle slaughter and beef production are expected to decline in 2015.  Canadian beef exports are expected to close to 2014 levels in 2015 due to tight supplies.  Nevertheless, U.S. imports of Canadian beef are up nearly 14 percent in the first two months of 2015.  U.S. beef exports to Canada have continued to fall in 2015 with January and February combined beef exports to Canada down 20.9 percent.

Canadian feedlots have struggled with competitive disadvantages to the U.S. and limited cattle supplies.  Feedlot placements in Canada dropped sharply in the second half of 2014.  Feedlot placements in Alberta and Saskatchewan were down 16.9 percent year over year in the four months from last November through February.  March 1 cattle on feed inventories in Alberta and Saskatchewan were down 11.7 percent from one year ago.  Feedlot marketings in these two major Canadian cattle feeding provinces were down 14.6 percent in January and February compared to the same two months last year.  Fewer feedlot marketings in Canada impacts Canadian beef production and slaughter cattle exports.  Combined January and February U.S. imports of Canadian slaughter cattle were down 34.6 percent year over year, including a 55.1 percent decrease in slaughter steer imports; a 40.8 percent decrease in slaughter heifer imports; and 21.4 percent fewer cull cows imported for slaughter.

Record high U.S. feeder prices and a strong dollar favor Canadian exports of feeder cattle to the U.S.  U.S. imports of Canadian feeder cattle increased 37.8 percent in 2014 over the previous year.  This increase consisted of a 60 percent year over year increase in feeder heifers exported to the U.S. along with a 7 percent increase in feeder steers exported to the U.S.  In the first two months of 2015, total U.S. imports of Canadian feeder cattle are up a more modest 7 percent; the result of a 51.2 percent increase in feeder steer imports combined with a 12.6 percent decrease in feeder heifer exports. 

January 1, 2015 Canadian cattle inventories confirmed that cattle herd liquidation continued in 2014 with a beef cow herd of 4.78 million cows, down two percent from the previous year.  Beef replacement inventories were down one percent as well, indicating that herd expansion has not yet started in Canada.  This is consistent with slaughter and export data indicating that heifer slaughter in Canada was up 9 percent in 2014; 24 percent more slaughter heifers were exported to the U.S. and 60 percent more feeder heifers were exported in 2014 compared to 2013.  Decreased feeder and slaughter heifer exports so far in 2015 may indicate that heifer retention is beginning in Canada.

Decreased beef production in Canada in 2015 will hold beef exports close to 2014 levels despite favorable exchange rates.  U.S. imports of Canadian beef may moderate in the coming months from the strong year over year increases posted in January and February, though the U.S. may be picking up a larger share of total Canadian beef exports.  Slaughter cattle imports from Canada are already down year over year and will likely remain lower due to decreased Canadian feedlot production. Herd rebuilding may result in fewer cull cows exported to the U.S. for slaughter in 2015.  U.S. imports of Canadian feeder cattle may also moderate in coming months as a result of tight Canadian cattle supplies and increased heifer retention in Canada.  Compared to 2014, Canada is likely to contribute relatively less to U.S. beef supplies, slaughter cattle supplies, and feeder cattle supplies in 2015.


Oklahoma State University, in compliance with Title VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Executive Order 11246 as amended, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and other federal laws and regulations, does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, disability, or status as a veteran in any of its policies, practices or procedures. This includes but is not limited to admissions, employment, financial aid, and educational services.  References within this publication to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, service mark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply endorsement by Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service.



Cattle Outlook



CATTLE OUTLOOK – Ron Plain and Scott Brown
Ag Economics, MU   April 3, 2015

This week’s fed cattle prices were the highest since early January.
Through Thursday, the 5-area average price for slaughter steers sold
on a live weight basis was $166.67/cwt, up $2.67 from last week’s
average and up $15.24 from a year ago.  The 5 area average dressed
price this week for steers was $264.72/cwt, up $4.72 for the week.

The March jobs report is not encouraging.  The economy added only
126,000 non-farm jobs last month.  That is the lowest monthly number
since December 2013.  Slow growth is not good for meat demand.

USDA’s March Prospective Plantings report put 2015 corn acres at
89.199 million, down 1.5% from last year; soybean planting were
predicted to be 84.635 million acres, up 1.1%; and wheat plantings at
55.367 million acres, down 2.6% compared to a year earlier.  USDA’s
estimate of corn acres is higher than the average of pre-release trade
forecasts while soybean and wheat acres are lower.  The May corn
futures lost 4 cents this week but May soybean futures gained 19
cents. 

This morning the choice boxed beef cutout value was $255.97/cwt, up
$5.54 from the previous Friday and up $26.80 from a year ago.  The
select carcass cutout was $249.47/cwt this morning, up $2.85 from last
week and up $31.02 from a year ago.

Cattle slaughter this week totaled 525,000 head, down 1.7% from the
week before and down 10.5% from the same week last year.

Year-to-date cattle slaughter is down 7.3% and year-to-date beef
production is down 5.2% compared to the same period last year.

The average steer dressed weight for the week ending on March 21 was
871 pounds, unchanged from the week before and up 15 pounds compared
to the same week last year.  Steer weights have been above year-ago
each week since June 14, 2014.

Feeder cattle prices at Oklahoma City were mostly steady to $3 higher
this week.  Prices for medium and large frame #1 steers by weight
group were: 400-450# $312-$328, 450-500# $276-$316, 500-550#
$289-$296, 550-600# $257-$284, 600-650# $230-$262.25, 650-700#
$233-$252, 700-750# $217.50-$235, 750-800# $205-$220.50, 800-900#
$192-$214, and 900-1000#, $184.50-$198/cwt.

There was no futures trading today due to the Good Friday holiday.  On
Thursday, the April live cattle futures contract settled at
$163.02/cwt, up 40 cents for the week.  June fed cattle settled at
$153.37/cwt, also up 40 cents from the previous Friday.  August fed
cattle lost 13 cents this week to settle at $149.82/cwt.  October live
cattle ended the week at $151.40/cwt.

The April feeder cattle contract ended the week at $220.37/cwt, up
$1.10 for the week.  May feeders settled at $217.45/cwt which is 67
cents lower than the Friday before. The August contract ended the week
at $218.55/cwt.

Thursday, April 2, 2015